Advantages and disadvantages of HFC-245fa blowing agent in  polyurethane spray foam

Advantages and disadvantages of HFC-245fa blowing agent in polyurethane spray foam

With the accelerated phase-out of HCFC-141b, the Center for Environmental Protection External Cooperation of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment recommends that the selection of HCFCs phase-out replacement technologies should be environmentally friendly, low-carbon, safe, and economical. This means no damage to the ozone layer; low global warming potential (GWP), good insulation performance, and high energy efficiency; production that meets safety standards; and a high cost-performance ratio, with raw material and production costs that are acceptable to the market.

Production Process of Polyurethane Rigid Foam for Refrigerators (two)

Production Process of Polyurethane Rigid Foam for Refrigerators (two)

Precisely control the proportion of various raw materials according to different refrigerator models and thermal insulation requirements to ensure the optimal performance of the polyurethane rigid foam. Generally, the optimal formula is determined through experiments and experience. For example, the molar ratio of polyol to isocyanate is usually between 1:1 and 1:1.5, the amount of blowing agent is generally about 10%-20% of the polyol amount, and the amount of catalyst is adjusted according to the reaction rate and foam performance requirements.